Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Camelina (Camelina sativa L.) Doubled Haploid Lines in the Climate Conditions of Kermanshah Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

2 Agricultural Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Forests and Rangelands Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Water stress is one of the most important limiting abiotic factors for crop plants. The drought resistance was investigated for 35 camelina doubled haploid lines along with a check cultivar (Sohail), under two irrigation conditions (supplementary irrigation and rainfed), during the crop year 2020-2021. The study was conducted in the randomized complete block design by three replications in three regions of Eslamabad-e Gharb, Mahidasht and Mehrgan. The indices of stress sensitivity (SSI), tolerance (Tol), drought resistance (DTI), mean productivity (MP), geometric mean productivity (GMP), harmonic mean (MH), yield stability (YSI) and drought resistance (DI) were calculated using seed yield in two environments of rainfed (Ys) and supplementary irrigation (Yp). There was a significant difference among regions for YS, Yp, MP, GMP, MH, and DTI indices. MP, GMP, MH, DTI and DI indices had significant correlations with two environments. According to MH, MP and GMP, the highest and the lowest drought resistance were observed in the Mehrgan region and Islamabad region, respectively. Mahidasht showed the highest value of drought resistance and Mehrgan showed the lowest value of drought resistance among the lines based on DTI. In addition, the results of the mean comparison, cluster analysis, principal components analysis and the three-dimensional scatter diagram of the lines based on the yield of two environments and the MP index showed that lines 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 7 and the check cultivar had more drought resistant. These lines had high seed yield in two contrast environments and showed more drought resistance, which is recommendable for breeding programs in the climatic conditions of Kermanshah province.

Graphical Abstract

Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Camelina (Camelina sativa L.) Doubled Haploid Lines in the Climate Conditions of Kermanshah Province

Highlights

  • There is genetic variation for drought resistance among different Camelina lines.
  • Supplementary irrigation increased yield in Camelina cultivation in Kermanshah Province.
  • The indices of drought resistance, mean productivity, geometric mean productivity, harmonic mean and drought resistance were suitable for testing drought resistance in Camelina.
  • The seven lines were introduced for the weather conditions of Kermanshah Province, which had high resistance to drought.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adel S., Carels N. 2023. Plant tolerance to drought stress with emphasis on wheat. plants 12(11): 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112170
Ahmad Z., Anjum S., Skalicky M., Waraich E.A., Muhammad Sabir Tariq R., Ayub M.A., Hossain A., Hassan M.M., Brestic M., Sohidul Islam M., Habib-Ur-Rahman M. 2021. Selenium alleviates the adverse effect of drought in oilseed crops camelina (Camelina sativa L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.). Molecules 26(6): 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061699
Bakhshi B., Rostami Ahmadvandi H., Fanaei H.R. 2021. Camelina, an adaptable oilseed crop for the warm and dried regions of Iran. Central Asian Journal of Plant Science Innovation 1(1): 39-45. https://doi.org/10.22034/CAJPSI.2021.01.05
Bao X., Hou X., Duan W., Yin B., Ren J., Wang Y., Liu X., Gu L., Zhen W. 2023. Screening and evaluation of drought resistance traits of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1194759. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1194759
Berti M., Gesch R., Eynck C., Anderson J., Cermak S. 2016. Camelina uses, genetics, genomics, production, and management. Industrial Crops and Products  94: 690-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.034
Borzoo S., Mohsenzadeh S., Kahrizi D. 2021a. Water-deficit stress and genotype variation induced alteration in seed characteristics of Camelina sativa. Rhizosphere 20: 100427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100427
Borzoo S., Mohsenzadeh S., Moradshahi A., Zanani H. 2021b. Characterization of physiological responses and fatty acid compositions of Camelina sativa genotypes under water deficit stress and symbiosis with Micrococcus yunnanensis. Symbiosis 83: 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-020-00733-5
Bouslama M., Schapaugh W.T. 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science 24(5): 933-937. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x
Čanak P., Jeromela A.M., Vujošević B., Kiprovski B., Mitrović B., Alberghini B., Facciolla E., Monti A., Zanetti F. 2020. Is drought stress tolerance affected by biotypes and seed size in the emerging oilseed crop Camelina?. Agronomy 10(12): 1856. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121856
Esmaeili A., Najaphy A., Kahrizi D. 2023. Evaluation of drought tolerance in camelina (Camelina Sativa) doubled haploid lines using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG). Journal of Crop Breeding 14(44): 199-210. (In Farsi). http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jcb.14.44.199
Farshadfar E., Mohammadi R., Farshadfar M., Dabiri S. 2013. Relationships and repeatability of drought tolerance indices in wheat-rye disomic addition lines. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7(1): 130-138. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:54979989
Fernandez G.C. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceedings of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress, AVRDC Publication, Tainan, Taiwan 257-270.
Fischer R.A., Maurer R.A. 1978. Drought resistance spring wheat cultivars.1, grain yield responses. Journal Agriculture Research 29(5): 897-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
George N., Thompson S.E., Hollingsworth J., Orloff S., Kaffka S. 2018. Measurement and simulation of water-use by canola and camelina under cool-season conditions in California. Agricultural Water Management 196: 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.09.015
Kim R.J., Kim H.U., Suh M.C. 2019. Development of camelina enhanced with drought stress resistance and seed oil production by co-overexpression of MYB96A and DGAT1C. Industrial Crops and Products 138: 111475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111475
Lan J. 1998. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica 7: 85-87.
Nahas L.D., Alsamman A.M., Hamwieh A., Al-Husein N., Lababidi Gh. 2020. Characterization of EST‑SSR markers in bread wheat EST related to drought tolerance and functional analysis of SSR‑containing unigenes. Highlights in Bioscience 3: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.36462/H.BioSci.20203
Pavlista A.D., Isbell T.A., Baltensperger D.D., Hergert G.W. 2011. Planting date and development of spring-seeded irrigated canola, brown mustard and camelina. Industrial Crops and Products 33(2): 451-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.029
Rosielle A.A., Hamblin I. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science 21(6): 43-46. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
Rostami Ahmadvandi H., Kahrizi D., Ghobadi R., Akbarabadi A. 2021a. Camelina, a unique oil seed with high tolerance to drought and cold. Oilseed Plants 2(2): 63-73. (In Farsi). https://jop.areeo.ac.ir/article_123956.html
Rostami Ahmadvandi H., Zeinodini A., Ghobadi R., Gore M. 2021b. Benefits of adding camelina to rainfed crop rotation in Iran: a crop with high drought tolerance. Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops 1(2): 91-96. https://doi.org/10.22126/ATIC.2021.6410.1007
Royo-Esnal A., Valencia-Gredilla F. 2018. Camelina as a rotation crop for weed control in organic farming in a semiarid Mediterranean climate. Agriculture 8(10): 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8100156
Sangi S.E., Nagaphy A., Cheghamirza K., Mohammadi R. 2021. Assessment of drought tolerance indices in durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) genotypes. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 14(4): 901-911. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2020.3310.1842
Seleiman M.F., Al-Suhaibani N., Ali N., Akmal M., Alotaibi M., Refay Y., Dindaroglu T., Abdul-Wajid H.H., Battaglia M.L. 2021. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants (Basel) 10(2): 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020259
Solat Petloo N., Asghari Zakaria R., Ebadi A., Sharifi Ziveh P. 2023. Evaluation of yield and drought tolerance indices of cow cockle (Vaccaria hispanica (Mill.) Rauschert) ecotypes. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 16(2): 517-530. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2023.4779.2069
Soltanieh M., Talei D., Nejatkhah P. 2023. Evaluation of growth, yield and yield components responses of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) to nitrogen and methanol under drought stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 16(3): 587-601. (In Farsi). https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2023.4822.2077
Stasnik P., Großkinsky D.K., Jonak C. 2022. Physiological and phenotypic characterization of diverse Camelina sativa lines in response to waterlogging. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 183: 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.05.007  
Zanetti F., Eynck C., Christou M., Krzyżaniak M., Righini D., Alexopoulou E., Stolarski M.J., Van Loo E.N., Puttick D., Monti A. 2017. Agronomic performance and seed quality attributes of camelina (Camelina sativa L. crantz) in multi-environment trials across Europe and Canada. Industrial Crops and Products 107: 602-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.06.022
Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops
Volume 4, Issue 3
Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops (Agrotech Ind Crops) (Online ISSN: 2783-2945)
September 2024
Pages 134-146

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics