Plant Proteomics and Industrial Oil Plants

Document Type : Review Article

Author

Agriculture (Plant Breeding and Genetic) Department, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Proteomics is one of the applied sciences in biology, this century. Using the mass spectrometer device and the development of databases and bioinformatics tools, a fundamental evolution has taken place in molecular biology and new perspectives have been found in agriculture, pharmaceuticals, molecular biology, etc. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis methods are a popular technique for protein separation because they allow researchers to quantify protein changes on a large scale. Proteomics is a large-scale evaluation of proteins. The term proteomics was produced in 1997 after the introduction of genomics. Although the use of databases and bioinformatics to interpret the results of proteomic findings is being seriously developed. In the study of huge proteomic data, it is very desirable to use the capacity of multivariate statistical methods, due to having many and extensive variables, because these multivariate statistical methods provide the possibility of statistical analysis of several variables, therefore, the use of this statistical technique recently, it has attracted the attention of proteomics scientists. In addition to understanding the tools of proteomics, we are looking for the practical use of proteomics, especially in agriculture, because today the pressure is on plant breeders to provide "smart plant varieties" that are more suitable genotypes with the ability to tolerate biotic and abiotic stress a wider range of climate changes for dealing with the food insecurity of future generations. Therefore, modern plant breeders need precise genetic modification with a gene tracking system for the modified trait. The only caveat in the application of proteomics in biotechnology applications is that genetic modification must be expressed at the protein level. The purpose of this research is to examine the concepts of some main topics in the field of proteomics in simple language, and of course, case studies of proteomics in plants, especially in industrial oilseed plants.

Graphical Abstract

Plant Proteomics and Industrial Oil Plants

Highlights

  • Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis methods allow researchers to quantify protein changes on a large scale.
  • The use of databases and bioinformatics to interpret the results of proteomic findings is being developed seriously.
  • The use of multivariate statistical methods has attracted the attention of proteomics scientists.
  • The current study is examining the concepts of proteomics, especially in industrial crops.

Keywords


Alvarez S., Roy Choudhury S., Sivagnanam K., Hicks L.M., Pandey S. 2015. Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Camelina sativa Seeds Overexpressing the AGG3 Gene to Identify the Proteomic Basis of Increased Yield and Stress Tolerance. Journal of Proteome Research 14(6): 2606-2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00150
Angenendt P, Glökler J, Murphy D, Lehrach H, Cahill DJ. 2002. Toward optimized antibody microarrays: a comparison of current microarray support materials. Analytical biochemistry 309(2): 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00257-9
Balbuena T.S., Salas J.J., Martínez-Force E., Garcés R., Thelen J.J. 2011. Proteome analysis of cold acclimation in sunflower. Journal of Proteome Research 10(5): 2330-2346. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr101137q
Berenbaum M.R. 1995. The chemistry of defense: theory and practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 92(1): 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.1.2
Cañas B., López-Ferrer D., Ramos-Fernández A., Camafeita E., Calvo E. 2006. Mass spectrometry technologies for proteomics. Briefings in Functional Genomics 4(4): 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/eli002
Çulha Erdal Ş., Eyidoğan F., Ekmekçi Y. 2021. Comparative physiological and proteomic analysis of cultivated and wild safflower response to drought stress and re-watering. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 27(2): 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-00934-2
Fullaondo A., Vicario A., Aguirre A., Barrena I., Salazar A. 2001. Quantitative analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis protein patterns: a method for studying genetic relationships among Globodera pallida populations. Heredity (Edinb) 87(Pt 3): 266-272. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00847.x
Issaq H., Veenstra T. 2008. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE): advances and perspectives. Biotechniques 44(5): 697-700. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112823
Jackman R.L., Yada R.Y. 2009. Protein engineering: Methodology, applications and status. Food Biotechnology 1(2): 167-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905438709549666
Jensen K.N., Jessen F., Jørgensen B.M. 2008. Multivariate data analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis protein patterns from few samples. Journal of Proteome Research 7(3): 1288-1296. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr700800s
Jessen F., Lametsch R., Bendixen E., Kjaersgård I.V., Jørgensen B.M. 2002. Extracting information from two-dimensional electrophoresis gels by partial least squares regression. Proteomics and Systems Biology 2(1): 32-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/1615-9861(200201)2:1<32::AID-PROT32>3.0.CO;2-J
Kakaei M. 2015. Screening and identification of resistance and susceptibility factors of alfalfa (Hypera postica) by biometry and proteomics. Ph.D. thesis of Bu-Ali Sina University. (In Farsi).
Kakaei M. 2017. Response of Common Bean proteome to Two-Spotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae Koch using Proteomics Techniques. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 37(3): 305-320. https://doi.org/10.22117/jesi.2017.113810. (In Farsi).
Kakaei M. 2018. Application of Two-dimensional Electrophoresis to Identify the Resistance and Sensitivity Sources of Yellow Rust Disease (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici West.) in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agricultural Biotechnology 17(1): 11-22. https://doi.org/10.22084/AB.2018.14382.1358. (In Farsi).
Kakaei M., Kiani S. 2019. Evaluation of Proteins Expression Differences of Royan Axes in Two Cultivar of Rice with Two-dimensional Electrophoresis. Agricultural Biotechnology Journal 10(1): 43-53. https://doi.org/10.22084/AB.2020.18624.1404. (In Farsi).
Kakaei M., Mazaherlaghab H., Mostafae A. 2017. Study of protein changes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in normal conditions and under the tension from alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica Gyll.) feeding. Agricultural Biotechnology Journal 9(1): 49-66. https://doi.org/10.22103/jab.2017.1668. (In Farsi).
Klose J. 2009. From 2-D electrophoresis to proteomics. Electrophoresis 30(S1): 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200900118
López-Pedrouso M., Bernal J., Franco D., Zapata C. 2014. Evaluating two-dimensional electrophoresis profiles of the protein phaseolin as markers of genetic differentiation and seed protein quality in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62(29): 7200-7208. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf502439u
Moosavi-Movahedi A.A., Chamani J., Taghavi A.H., Moghadamnia S.H. 2009. Proteins Structure and Function. University of Tehran Press. 2nd Edition. 153 pp.
Neumann N.G., Nazarenus T.J., Aznar-Moreno J.A., Rodriguez-Aponte S.A., Mejias Veintidos V.A., Comai L., Durrett T.P., Cahoon E.B. 2021. Generation of camelina mid-oleic acid seed oil by identification and stacking of fatty acid biosynthetic mutants. Industrial Crops and Products 159: 113074.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113074
Pandey A., Mann M. 2000. Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature 405(6788): 837-846. https://doi.org/10.1038/35015709
Shirdel S.A, Alemi M, Khalifeh K. 2013. New topics in biology: proteomics and nanobiotechnology. Modares Journal of Biotechnology 4 (2): 9-22. http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-2462-en.html. (In Farsi).
Wright P.C., Noirel J., Ow S.Y., Fazeli A. 2012. A review of current proteomics technologies with a survey on their widespread use in reproductive biology investigations. Theriogenology 77(4): 738-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.11.012
Yarmush M.L., Jayaraman A. 2002. Advances in proteomic technologies. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 4: 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.020702.153443