Yield and Yield Components of Grapevines as Influenced by Mixed Nano Chelated Fertilizer, Humic Acid and Chemical Fertilizers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Tak Gostar Zagros Company, Kermanshah, Iran

3 Temperate Fruits Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

4 Department of Biotechnology, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences and Centre of Research for Development, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Abstract

Nutrient elements are the most important factor limiting crop production in plants. In addition to reducing the yield and quality of the product, the lack of mineral elements causes nutrient deficiency in humans. Based on this, in order to study the effect of humic acid and mixed nano chelated fertilizer together with chemical fertilizers on the growth and yield of Yaqouti grape, an experiment was conducted as a randomized complete block design with 3 replications in Kandoleh area of Sahneh city of Kermanshah province in two successive years 2020 and 2021. For this purpose, ten different fertilizer treatments were considered include; mixed nano chelated fertilizer + chemical fertilizer (T1), mixed nano chelated fertilizer + humic acid with irrigation (T2), mixed nano chelated fertilizer + humic acid (T3), humic acid with irrigation + chemical fertilizer (T4), humic acid + chemical fertilizer (T5), humic acid with irrigation (T6), humic acid (T7), mixed nano chelated fertilizer (T8), chemical fertilizer (T9), control without fertilizer (T10). Fertilizer treatments have a statistically significant effect (P≤0.05) on the traits of number of berries per bunch, number of bunches per plant, bunch weight, bunch length and width, yield per plant, yield per hectare, Total Soluble Solid (TSS), Titratable Acid (TA), TSS/TA and pH of juice. Using a combination of treatments was more beneficial than single treatments. The practical result of this research is the use of treatments T1 and T3 for gardeners, respectively. Qualitative properties such as total soluble solids and TSS/TA were higher in most combined treatments, especially in the treatment of mixed nano chelated fertilizer + chemical fertilizer (T1), which was at the top.

Graphical Abstract

Yield and Yield Components of Grapevines as Influenced by Mixed Nano Chelated Fertilizer, Humic Acid and Chemical Fertilizers

Highlights

  • Humic acid can increase the uptake of nutrients in the grapevine.
  • The use of chemical fertilizers in combination with humic acid increased the yield of grapevine.
  • It is appropriate to apply chemical fertilizers in combination with humic acid or nono fertilizer.
  • The highest fruit yield was achieved by humic acid + chemical fertilizer and nano fertilizer + chemical fertilizer.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abada M.A.M. 2009. Reducing the amount of inorganic N fertilizers in Superior grape vineyard by using organic and biofertilizers and humic acid. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 87(1):17-344.
Abd El-Aziz Y.Z. 2011. Response of Thompson seedless grapevines to application of organic fertilizer humic acid and some biofertilizers. Ph. D. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture Minia University, Egypt.
Abd El-Razek E., Treutter D., Saleh M.M.S., El-Shammaa M., Amera A.F., Abdel-Hamid N. 2011. Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on productivity and fruit quality of 'crimson seedless' grape. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. 2(2): 332-342. https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2011.2.2.330.340
Abourayya MS., Kaseem N.E., Mahmoud T.S.M., Rakha A.M., Eisa R.A., Amin O.A. 2020. Impact of soil application with humic acid and foliar spray of Milagro bio-stimulant on vegetative growth and mineral nutrient uptake of Nonpareil almond young trees under Nubaria conditions. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 44, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00296-x
Ahmed F.F., Ragab M.A., Merwad E.A.M., Mekawy A.Y. 2012. Improving productivity of Thompson seedless grapevine by application of some vitamins, humic acid and farmyard manure extract. Minia Journal of Agricultural Research and Development. 32(3):131 - 145.
Ahmed H.M.A., Faissal, F.A., Moawad F.E., Abdelaal M.A. 2013.The beneficial effects of some humic acid, Em1 and weed control treatments on fruiting of superior grapevines. Stem Cell. 4(3): 25-38.
Akin A. 2011. Effects of cluster reduction, herbagreen and humic acid applications on grape yield and quality of HorozKarasi and Göküzüm grape cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology. 10(29): 5593-5600.
Anon, 1997. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official analytical Chemists, AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, 16theds.
Arji I., Karimpour Kolejooei S., Nejatian M.A. 2020. Investigating the effect of humic acid, nano fertilizer and chemical fertilizer treatments on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Yaqouti grapes in Kermanshah province. Extension Grape Journal. 1(1):1-8.
Asgharzade A., Babaeian M. 2012. Investigating the effects of humic acid and acetic acid foliar application on yield and leaves nutrient content of grape (Vitis vinifera L.). African Journal of Microbiology Research 6(31): 6049-6054.https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.425
Aydın S., Akgül A., Çoban H. 2005. The effects of foliar application of potassium (K) on yield and quality of vineyards in Alaehir district. C.B.Ü. Applied Natural Science Institıte Publication. 1: 23-27.
Bajeli J., Tripathi S., Kumar A., Tripathi A., Upadhyay R.K. 2016.Organic manures a convincing source for quality production of Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Industrial Crops and Products. 83: 603-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.064
Bybordi A., Shabanov A. 2010. Effects of the foliar application of magnesium and zinc on the yield and quality of three grape cultivars grown in the calcareous soils of Iran. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2(1):81-86. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb223575
Conradie W.J., Saayman D. 1989. Effect of long-term nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization on Chenin Blanc vines II. Leaf analyses and grape composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 40:91-98.
da Silva Júnior S., Stamford N.P., Oliveira W.S., Silva E.V.N., Santos C.E.R.S., de Freitas A.D.S., da Silva V.S.G. 2018. Microbial biofertilizer increases nutrient uptake on grape (Vitis labrusca L) grown in an alkaline soil reclaimed by sulfur and Acidithiobacillus. Australian Journal of Crop Science.12(10):1695-1701. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.18.12.10.p1454
El-Aal F.S.A., Shaheen A.M., Ahmed A.A., Mahmoud A.R. 2010. Effect of foliar application of urea and amino acids mixtures as antioxidants on growth and characteristics of Squash. Research journal of agriculture and biological sciences. 6:583-588.
El Masri I. Y., Al Akiki M., Jamal Eldin N., Ghantous G., El Sebaaly Z., Hammoud M., Sassine Y.N. 2021. Conventional vs. nano-Ca fertilizers effects on traditional table grape Tfiefihi. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 44(20): 3020-3033. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1936032
El-Masri I.Y., Samaha C., Sassine Y. N., Assadi F. 2018. Effects of nano-fertilizers and greenhouse cultivation on phenological development-stages and yield of seedless table grapes varieties. In IX International Scientific Agriculture Symposium" AGROSYM 2018", Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 4-7 October 2018. Book of Proceedings (pp. 192-196). University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture.
Fagbenro J.A., Agboola A.A. 1993. Effect of different levels of humic acid on the growth and nutrient uptake of teak seedlings. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 16:1465-1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169309364627
Farg S.G. 2006. Minimizing mineral fertilizers in grapevine farm to reduce the chemical residuals in grapes. M.Sc. Thesis, Institute of Environmental studies and Research. Ain Shams University, Egypt. 67 p.
Ferrara G., Brunetti G. 2010. Effects of the times of application of a soil humic acid on berry quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cv Italia. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 8:817-822. https://doi.org/10.5424/1283
Franjic S. 2018. Importance of environmental protection on the global level. Scientific Journal of Research and Reviews. 1(2): SJRR.MS.ID.000506. https://doi.org/10.33552/SJRR.2018.01.000506
Kabeel H., Abd El- Atif. F.M., Baza M.S.M. 2008. Growth, fruiting and nutritional status of "Le-Conte" pear trees in response to mineral and humate fertilizers. Annals of Agricultural Science. 46(2):139-156.
Kannaiyan S. 2002. Biotechnology of Biofertilizers. Alpha Science International Ltd Pangabourne England. Springer Dordrecht. 376P.
Khodabakhsh Zadeh S., Rasoli M., Maleki M. 2013. Effect of iron nano fertilizer on some growth factors and antioxidant enzymes of grape. First National Conference on Nanotechnology Benefits and Applications. Hamedan, Hegmataneh Environment Evaluators Association. http://www.civilica.com/Paper-NANOO01-NANOO01_033.html
Kok D., Bal E. 2016. Effects of foliar seaweed and humic acid treatments on monoterpene profile and biochemical properties of cv. Riesling Berry (V. vinifera L.) throughout the maturation period. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 13(2): 67-74.
Latifi N., Mohammad Dost H. 1998. Effect of time and amount of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield of three wheat cultivars under dryland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of Gorgan. 5(1-2):82-88.
Maccarthy P. 2001. The principles of humic substances. Soil Science. 166:738-751. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-200111000-00003
Mahdavi S., Karim, R., Valipouri Goudarzi A. 2022. Effect of nano zinc oxide, nano zinc chelated and zinc sulfate on vineyard soil Zn- availability and grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) yield and quality. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 45(13): 1961-1976. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2022.2046081
Manisalidis I., Stavropoulou E., Stavropoulou A., Bezirtzoglou E. 2020. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution. A Review. Frontiers in Public Health. 8: 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014
Martín P., Delgado R., Gonzalez M.R., Gallegos J.I. 2004. Colour of 'Tempranillo' grapes as affected by different nitrogen and potassium fertilization rates. Acta Horticulturae. 652:153-160. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.652.18
Mayhew L. 2004. Humic substances in biological agriculture. A scientific review. Part 1. Acres USA, 34(1):11-14.
Mekawy A.Y.H. 2012. Attempts for improving yield quantitively and qualitatively of Thompson seedless grapevines by application of some antioxidants with humic acid and farmyard manure extract. Ph. D. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture Minia University, Egypt. 155 p.
Mostafa E.A.M., El-shamma M.S., Hagass L.F. 2006. Correction of boron deficiency in grape vines of Bez El-Anze cultivar. American-Eurasian Journalof Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 1(3):301-305.
Mostashari M. 2012. Effect of some macro and micro elements of qualitative and quantitative properties of Currants grapes in Qazvin. Agricultural and Natural Resources Journal. 14(2):29-34.
Nikkhah R., Nafar H., Rastgoo S., Dorostkar M. 2013. Effect of foliar application of boron and zinc on qualitative and quantitative fruit characteristics of grapevine (vitis vinifera L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 6(9):485-492
Noroozisharaf A., Kaviani M. 2018. Effect of soil application of humic acid on nutrients uptake, essential oil and chemical compositions of garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) under greenhouse conditions. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 24(3):423-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0510-y
Popescu G.C., Popescu. M. 2018.Yield, berry quality and physiological response of grapevine to foliar humic acid application. SciELO journals. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017030
Rabie A.M., Negm A.A. 2012. Effect of some organic treatments on some grapevine cultivars. Ph. D. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture Cairo University Egypt. 125 pp.
Rahman K.M.A., Zhang D. 2018. Effects of fertilizer broadcasting on the excessive use of inorganic fertilizers and environmental sustainability. Sustainability. 10, 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030759
Sabir A., Yazar K., Sabir F., Kara Z., Yazici M.A., Goksu N. 2014. Vine growth, yield, berry quality attributes and leaf nutrient content of grapevines as influenced by seaweed extract (Ascophyllum nodosum) and nanosize fertilizer pulverizations. Scientia Horticulturae. 175:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.05.021
Saleh M.S., El- Ashry S., Gomaa A.M. 2006. Performance of Thompson seedless grapevines as influenced by organic fertilizer, humic acid and biofertilizers under sandy soil conditions. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 2 (6): 467 - 741.
Samavat S., Malakoti M.J. 2005. The need for organic acids (humic acid and fulvic acid) to increase the quantity and quality of agricultural products. Technical publication 463. Soil and Water Research Institute. pp. 13.
Sefan R.F., El-Boray, M.S. 2019. Effect of potassium nano fertilizer on yield and berry qualities of 'flame seedless' grapevines. Journal of Plant Production. 10(11): 929-934. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2019.68553
Singh R., Srivastava P., Verma P., Singh P., Bhadouria R., Singh V.K., Singh H., Raghubanshi A.S., 2020. Exploring soil responses to various organic amendments under dry tropical agroecosystems, Chapter 21 - Eds by Prasad, M.N.V. and Pietrzykowski, M. In Climate Change and Soil Interactions, Elsevier 583-611 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818032-7.00021-7
Uddin M.M., Zakee M.C.M., Zavahir J.S., Marikar F.M.M.T., Jahan I. 2021. Heavy metal accumulation in Rice and aquatic plants used as human food: A General Review. Toxics. 9: 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9120360
Vatankhah A., Mohammadkhani A., Hooshm S., Kiani S. 2016. Study the effect of humic acid and zinc on the quantity and quality of fruit, photosynthetic pigments and mineral concentrations of grapevine cv. 'Asgari', Journal of Crops Improvement 18 (2): 303-318. https://doi: 10.22059/jci.2016.56570
Vikram N., Sagar A., Gangwar C., Husain R., Kewat R.N. 2022. Properties of humic acid substances and their effect in soil quality and plant health. In: Makan, A., editor. Humus and Humic Substances - Recent Advances. London: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105803
Yener H., Coban H., Cakıcı H., 2008. The effects of foliar potassium (K) applications on yield and N, P, K contents of leaves of Sultani Çekirdeksiz (Vitis vinifera L.). Ege Üniversity Agricultural Faculty Publication. 45: 21-25.
Zanin L, Tomasi N, Cesco S, Varanini Z and Pinton R., 2019. Humic substances contribute to plant iron nutrition acting as chelators and biostimulants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10:675. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00675
Zaremanesh H., Akbari N., Eisvand H., Ismaili A., Feizian M. 2020. The Effect of humic acid on soil physicochemical and biological properties under salinity stress conditions in pot culture of Satureja khuzistanica Jamzad. Ecopersia 8(3):147-154.
Zhu Q., Xie, X., Xu Y., 2022. Fertilization regulates grape yield and quality in by altering soil nutrients and the microbial community. Sustainability 14, 10857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710857
Zlamalova T., Elbl J., Baron M., Belíkova H., Lampír L., Hlusek J., Losak T. 2015. Using foliar applications of magnesium and potassium to improve yields and some qualitative parameters of vine grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant, Soil and Environment. 61(10): 451-457. https://doi.org/10.17221/437/2015-PSE
Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops
Volume 2, Issue 3
Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops (Agrotech Ind Crops) (Online ISSN: 2783-2945)
September 2022
Pages 156-165

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics